Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by 24gttghh 3115 days ago
I'm missing how that case relates to the 10th amendment, as it seems to primarily deal with Article V.
1 comments
CalChris 3115 days ago
The appellees tried to use the 10th and the Court said no and then further said the 10th is basically a legal truism.

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/282/716.html

link
munk-a 3115 days ago
Sorry, by "legal truism" you mean inherently enforceable because it is reinforcing a point that is taken to be true without any sort of countermand?

Your statement seems self-contradictory.

link