Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
CalChris
3111 days ago
The appellees tried to use the 10th and the Court said no and then further said the 10th is basically a legal truism.
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/282/716.html
1 comments
munk-a
3111 days ago
Sorry, by "legal truism" you mean inherently enforceable because it is reinforcing a point that is taken to be true without any sort of countermand?
Your statement seems self-contradictory.
link
Your statement seems self-contradictory.