You get the message that you achieved your standing goal right after the hour in which you achieved it. So it's entirely possible that you stood at 22:10, went to bed at 22:30, and get the achievement message at 23:00.
That's certainly possible, though I have noticed more quirky behavior than just this - the stand goal was just the most amusing one to me and that is why I posted that particular one here. I sometimes meet the exercise goal on a very sedentary day, while I don't meet it when I vigorously exercise, etc. I have a two story house and I climb and descend the steps probably 15+ times per day, yet for the current week, it shows that I have climbed 4 flights of steps. Then other days it seems like it's right on the mark. It just seems to be all over the place.
When I work from home I have a standing desk, and it looks like the watch does not pick me as standing, so I almost never reach the standing goal there
I have had some entertainment downloading an app that just feeds the accelerometer data to the screen. I did it first as a diagnostic to see if the accelerometer was broken (it was on this machine), but then I have some fun just watching the data on the screen and trying to imagine how on earth you're supposed to extract whether the user is standing or not, or going up stairs, etc.
And I say that from a position of being educated in signal processing, not just staring slackjawed at all the numbers. It's a very noisy signal, even after processing, and while it's correlated with the values you're trying to get out of the data it's not necessarily a very strong correlation. There's a lot of headwinds against getting this data out of the accelerometer. It's a minor miracle that they are as accurate as they are.
I would expect it to be accurate enough to detect the changes: if it is accurate enough to detect stand up and move, it also should pick stood up, moved a bit, didn't stand down. I guess the profile of accelerometer/altimeter data of standing up and moving from sitting is different from stand up and moving without having been seated before.
This happened to me an hour ago. I stood up at my desk and continued working but it didn't count according to the watch. I'd speculate that it wants some lateral movement as well - stand up and get a drink of water, maybe?
It wants you to repeat the process of standing. So, if you stand for an hour, that is only 1 stand procedure. You have to sit for 5 minutes, then stand again.
> Even if you stand all day, you still need to move around.
The purpose of the standing goal isn't just to be stood up, it's to stretch your legs and get you away from a desk (it doubles as a good reminder to take a break from your computer screen).
Most likely that the absence of movement data is perceived as sitting/standing. Since the stand goal requires standing and moving for at least one minute (the purpose of the stand goal is more to get you moving for at least a minute rather than just stand up - just standing up doesn't count), if you haven't moved for a while (50 minutes in an hour) then it gives you a nudge to do so.
It's a somewhat confusingly named metric. It actually measures "have you been moving around for at least one minute this hour?", where I think "moving around" is basically defined as generating steps.
My reason for this theory is that I sometimes bounce my leg when I'm sitting, and if I have my arm resting on said leg this sometimes triggers the stand goal for the hour.
It's not about whether you've been on your feet. It's about whether you've been moving that hour. The health benefit comes from moving on your feet every hour. When you're standing still for an hour you might as well be sitting.
The thing is, I'm not standing for hours, I move around, specially when thinking through a problem. I'd expect the system to realise there has been a change there.
Yeah I have the same issue. It seems the primary key in triggering a stand hour is having your arms down at your side, or moving around a bit - so keyboard posture doesn't work out.