|
|
|
|
|
by LrnByTeach
3151 days ago
|
|
Road Traffic won't worsen as you mentioned, let me explain why ? Increased capacity utilization. I assume, you are a technical person. If you look back at year 2000, In a typical IT company there is a server Box for each category. A Database server box , a WebServer Box ( physical machines ) etc.. very few people used viruvalization etc.. Physical Machines capacity utilization is around 15% .
Come to 2017, with Amazon AWS cloud is providing on demand servers to thousands of companies, all of them TIME Sharing tens of thousands of Servers. Same thing applies with self-driving cars. Higher utilization by ride sharing leads to FEWER cars on the Road.
Today average occupancy in a car may be 1.3
with Self-driving RIDE sharing, if it goes to 2.6 that is HALF the CARS on the ROAD compared to today. Doubling the average people in car from today is much EASIER, since that BEHAVIOUR of Sharing is tied to FINANCIAL gains to people. If you ride by yourself , 1000 miles/month SUBSCRIPTION cost is $500 vs. If you Share it is $200/month, that motivate people to SHARE and leads to LESS cars. |
|
But I see your point though. If people are incentivized to share a car then that might reduce the load.
That said, my suspicion is, once you take the driver out of the equation, you can do so much more than just ferrying people. E.g courier/shipping services, or mobile food stalls (food truck that sells food while moving on the highway, once engineers figure out how to safely and autonomously speed match two cars), etc. The induced demand may be greater than the savings from ride-sharing.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced_demand [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Braess%27s_paradox