|
|
|
|
|
by bryanlarsen
3148 days ago
|
|
My theory on why Apple prefers AMD over nVidia: AMD hardware at a specific price point is more powerful than nVidia hardware at the same price point. However, nVidia has superior drivers that eliminates the difference. And since Apple prefers to use their own drivers, nVidia loses their main point of differentiation. But of course the "Apple" drivers for video cards are basically vendor drivers with Apple doing QA & release management. But the driver is nVidia's secret sauce, they're not going to show it to Apple, since Apple is now a very competitive GPU manufacturer. At some point Apple will probably put their own GPU's inside Macs, so nVidia doesn't want to give them a head start. AMD cares less about giving Apple a head start because they care more about the short term than the long and competing against nVidia. |
|
As for the performance per buck thing it’s not accurate. For gaming and 3D applications AMD has a huge bottleneck in thier geometry pipeline which causes the to underperform in games especially pre VEGA. NVIDIA also used tile rasterization and shader output caching on die to increase performance this is something that AMD adopted only with VEGA.
Pure flops don’t mean much even for compute.