|
|
|
|
|
by barrkel
3158 days ago
|
|
Can you explain what you mean by evolved as opposed to universal? Because from my perspective, they mean the same thing when applied to this context. That is, if numeracy is evolved, everyone is fundamentally numerate at some level. And if numeracy is universal, then everybody is fundamentally numerate. They're both nature, not nurture. What do you mean by those words? (Personally, I think that numbers are mostly learned, but that the brain has an evolved aptitude for symbolic systems, mathematics being just one of many. I don't think any innate concept of number goes much beyond order of magnitude (i.e. logarithmic) relative differences.) |
|
To go further, the Mathematical Universe Hypothesis formalizes the notion that the universe itself is math, and that we are just discovering the math of the universe as we develop mathematics.
I'm personally agnostic on the universality of mathematics. Math is a tremendous tool for describing the universe, but I am willing to consider that a different intelligence might invent some accurate and non-mathematical predictive model.