|
|
|
|
|
by dandermotj
3205 days ago
|
|
That's a P/E of 60... Also this: > In exchange, Patreon takes only a tiny 5% cut. I hope this is sarcasm, because if I had to pay 5% to make any other transaction I'd be fuming. With a marginal cost of facilitating a new patron near zero, I don't think creators or patrons will suffer this as Patreon grows. |
|
Yes, you could technically use Patreon as nothing more than a payment processor by hosting all your stuff elsewhere and just linking to it from Patreon. But you still have to pay for that hosting, either directly or indirectly via ads. And part of the point of Patreon is to move away from ad-supported funding models. Of course, you currently have no choice but to use external hosting for some types of content, like videos, that Patreon can't host directly. But even then you still get all the community-building benefits of Patreon (and with YouTube comments being notoriously bad, providing a separate comment section might be a significant value-add). I wouldn't be surprised if Patreon added video hosting in some form in the future, probably via a partnership as they have done with streaming video.