[ChemicalWarfare]

"Liberals" are just as wiling to dismiss science when it goes against their narrative. This is especially noticeable in anything related to the PC-driven anti-scientific "human studies" narratives of the "left" where historical facts, DNA research and simple things like social behavior statistics or IQ test results are muted because they promote the thoughtcrime.

Speaking of wrongthink :) - the reason IPCC models run hot is because the scientists in charge are acting un-scientifically by discarding the data that doesn't agree with the "impending anthropogenic global warming doom" narrative and over-concentrating on CO2 as the culprit behind the "climate change".

So again, goes both ways, except I haven't heard of any falsifications at the hands the non-alarmist camp to prove their position this way - https://science.house.gov/news/press-releases/former-noaa-sc...

[Oletros]

> the reason IPCC models run hot is because the scientists in charge are acting un-scientifically by discarding the data that doesn't agree with the "impending anthropogenic global warming doom" narrative

Any source for this claim?

> So again, goes both ways, except I haven't heard of any falsifications at the hands the non-alarmist camp to prove their position this way

There was no falsification, you have to research better and not read what Lamar Smith says.

By the way, even Dr. Bates says that the data is accurate

> “The issue here is not an issue of tampering with data, but rather really of timing of a release of a paper that had not properly disclosed everything it was,”

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/02/how-culture-clash-noa...

So, any proof of data falsification?