[Oletros]

> the reason IPCC models run hot is because the scientists in charge are acting un-scientifically by discarding the data that doesn't agree with the "impending anthropogenic global warming doom" narrative

Any source for this claim?

> So again, goes both ways, except I haven't heard of any falsifications at the hands the non-alarmist camp to prove their position this way

There was no falsification, you have to research better and not read what Lamar Smith says.

By the way, even Dr. Bates says that the data is accurate

> “The issue here is not an issue of tampering with data, but rather really of timing of a release of a paper that had not properly disclosed everything it was,”

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/02/how-culture-clash-noa...

So, any proof of data falsification?