[bjoernm]

Hi all! We're building Nuclino, a unified workspace for teams. Here's why you should check it out:

* You can replace several collaboration tools with Nuclino as it combines the best ideas from many! (e.g. the board from Trello, real-time editing from Google Docs, internal links from wikis)

* Real-time collaborative editor with markdown commands

* Visualize your data with different views such as lists, boards, and graphs

You can use it to plan and track sprints, collaborate on requirements, share ideas, goals and more.

It's been working out great for ourselves and our first users, but we'd love to get feedback from a wider audience. If you don't mind a couple rough edges and missing features, it would be awesome if you could check it out and tell us what you think!

[Ralfp]

Looking good, but working in advertisement I've got small nitpick:

https://d33wubrfki0l68.cloudfront.net/e59309758061057655df10...

I would check with your legal if its all right to use competitors branding in your advertising. Depending on way this branding is presented (or not) it's either trademark violation, violation of laws forbidding direct comparisons with other brands (hence "better than leading product" in ads) or grounds for libel damages.

[bjoernm]

Thanks a lot for this hint, we’ll review it!

[notheguyouthink]

I'm likely in the minority and mean nothing negative, but for our team $9/m per user is a bit spendy. We'd love to pay (and need private workspaces), but while this product does have a lot of features it does not replace any of our existing tools entirely. Eg, we could replace our use of Github Issues with it, but we aren't saving money by dropping Github Issues - we're only spending more - $9 per team member.

So I love the product, but since it's yet another additional tool in our pipeline, it doesn't replace anything outright. Possible solutions for us:

1. A small plan which just includes the free tier features, plus private workspaces at a lower price. Not sure what price seems fair, but $4-$5 seems reasonable. $3 would be a no brainer price. 2. A tier priced according to total members. Eg, $30/m for 5 members, or something. Though, seeing as we'd need ~20, it would still rack up in price I imagine.. perhaps this is no different than just reducing the price. /shrug

So yea, not trying to say those prices make sense or are needed, just trying to provide constructive feedback on why we are not choosing to use it, despite liking it. $2,000 -> $3,000 a year is just a bit steep for what we "almost" have right now, in our existing tools.

Keep up the good work!

[bjoernm]

Thanks a lot for the constructive feedback! We just released the pricing several weeks ago and are open to experimentation. Would you be up for a quick chat about this? If yes, just send me an email (it's in my profile).