Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kang 3272 days ago
Yes, I am arguing it is centralised. Read about the centralised root signature system that is the way to add new TLDs to the system.

Also this is worse than the current system we have in the world because it wastes more energy in doing so!

It claims it is a decentralised naming system, though looking deeper you will find it is just clever marketing and underneath is it is only ethereum-platform based naming for anything like your address etc. will only work in eth browsers, not all etc. which I have already mentioned in my OP.
2 comments
chejazi 3272 days ago
> it is only ethereum-platform based naming for anything like your address etc.

The "etc" is important here, because it refers to richer resources such as content hashes. With this, you could load the entire "frontend" for a website from a decentralized datasource, e.g. Swarm. Meanwhile, the backend could be the Ethereum blockchain/smart contract methods.

link
kang 3272 days ago
No etc is not important because it is essentially a centralized mapping of a string of text to another, thats all.
link
nicksdjohnson 3272 days ago
You seem to have very (some would say ridiculously) high standards for 'decentralised'.

If the root multisig was deleted, would it be 'decentralised' in your book?

> It claims it is a decentralised naming system, though looking deeper you will find it is just clever marketing and underneath is it is only ethereum-platform based naming for anything like your address etc. will only work in eth browsers, not all etc. which I have already mentioned in my OP.

It doesn't claim to be DNS. DNS is not the only naming system.

link