|
|
|
|
|
by hackuser
3343 days ago
|
|
I agree with a lot of what you say, but to take the following a little out of context ... > I would emphasize that "truth" is not a binary thing but a highly contextual and multidimensional device. That can be taken too far and become the words of propaganda (whether or not the commenter intends it). Truth is not simple or always easy, but it's a real thing. The liar (not calling the parent a liar, but for purposes of example) says, 'the truth is complicated; we just have different opinions; look at all sides'; they say 'I lie, you lie, what's the difference?' No, there is truth, it's something to strive for, and it makes all the difference. |
|
Definitely not what I'm trying to say.
> No, there is truth, it's something to strive for, and it makes all the difference.
Absolutely. This requires that one does not take any propaganda position to be wholeistically true including those of your home country.
The search for truth comes not from authority or consensus, but from experiential reality. No authority and no consensus has a monopoly on experiential reality including the American domestic and international propaganda programmes and the consensus that they create or the Russian domestic and international propaganda programmes and the consensus that they create.
Propaganda is influence.
Facts are facts.