Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ecma 3372 days ago
Yes, see https://marc.info/?t=149028609000002&r=1&w=2 for some context. One of the other comments summarised why this is funny.
1 comments
rurban 3371 days ago
Only very few find this funny. This is no joke. This is a serious death treat towards LibreSSL. Theo reacted with a satire. But not a funny one.
link
ecma 3371 days ago
Pretty uncharitable read of what I meant by "funny" really. Satire can be amusing without invalidating the referenced issue. Don't get so hung up on the issue that you can't laugh about things too.
link
geofft 3371 days ago
What prevents LibreSSL from being under an Apache 2.0-compatible license?

(Also, what prevents LibreSSL from replying with "This is great, but can we get dual MIT/Apache 2.0"?)

link
rurban 3371 days ago
Dual licensing seems to be the best solution, yes. The license specialists need to come up with a solution. I'm not one
link