[rurban]

Only very few find this funny. This is no joke. This is a serious death treat towards LibreSSL. Theo reacted with a satire. But not a funny one.

[ecma]

Pretty uncharitable read of what I meant by "funny" really. Satire can be amusing without invalidating the referenced issue. Don't get so hung up on the issue that you can't laugh about things too.

[geofft]

What prevents LibreSSL from being under an Apache 2.0-compatible license?

(Also, what prevents LibreSSL from replying with "This is great, but can we get dual MIT/Apache 2.0"?)

[rurban]

Dual licensing seems to be the best solution, yes. The license specialists need to come up with a solution. I'm not one