|
|
|
|
|
|
by mahyarm
3382 days ago
|
|
|
Employers are more willing to hire risky people if it's easy to fire them. If it is not, large vetting processes are required and hiring people reduces. Because making a mistakes costs so much. It's even worse for small businesses where one bad hire you cannot fire can bankrupt the company. It's a reason why young people find it hard to get full time permanent jobs and are instead hired as temps instead. |
|
|
No they aren't. This is a nice theory, but it simply does not hold up in reality. Stop repeating it as gospel.
>If it is not, large vetting processes are required and hiring people reduces.
People vet their employees either way.
>It's a reason why young people find it hard to get full time permanent jobs and are instead hired as temps instead.
No it isn't. This reasoning was used to justify the 90 day trial period in NZ and it did NOT lead to more jobs.