[milesrout]

>Employers are more willing to hire risky people if it's easy to fire them.

No they aren't. This is a nice theory, but it simply does not hold up in reality. Stop repeating it as gospel.

>If it is not, large vetting processes are required and hiring people reduces.

People vet their employees either way.

>It's a reason why young people find it hard to get full time permanent jobs and are instead hired as temps instead.

No it isn't. This reasoning was used to justify the 90 day trial period in NZ and it did NOT lead to more jobs.