Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by lcw 3386 days ago
I don't think aesthetics play very much if any role in being a effective front end developer. Look at Craigslist the thing is terribly ugly and dated but still widely used and functional. The aesthetics look like someone with no taste in design or modern UX wrote it. If someone writes the next CraigsList by your definition are they not a successful front end developer? Sure having a taste for design is nice but hardly necessary to be successful at the craft.
3 comments
mrits 3386 days ago
Craigslist is actually a great design. Just imagine if a UX developer had their way with it. It would look like myspace.
link
debaserab2 3386 days ago
Not a good UX developer(/designer).

Craigslist has a great minimalist interface. There's a lot of ways it could go wrong, and it avoids a great majority of them. That said, I don't think a lot of development has gone into actually considering their use cases and developing workflows that prefer them.

Obviously, it's still a very useful site regardless, but I would not call it a well designed site.

link
JustSomeNobody 3386 days ago
Exactly. Craigslist work because it doesn't use huge images, scrolly this, flashy that. It works because it uses links as they were meant to be used. It works because it is terribly easy to navigate.

If a "proper designer" got hold of it, they'd ruin it.

link
mawburn 3386 days ago
UX != Design
link
mrits 3385 days ago
I find it really laughable that companies think you can separate these things. I realize that is the popular opinion but it what has gotten us into this situation in the first place. We have all these "pretty" sites that are unusable. It's an increasingly common skillset and you might as well get a pragmatic person to handle both.
link
debaserab2 3386 days ago
No, they are not a successful front end developer.

It is possible to have a successful website without having good front development.

It's possible to create a lot of useful things that don't have good design.

link
enraged_camel 3386 days ago
>>It's possible to create a lot of useful things that don't have good design.

Usefulness is good design.

link
debaserab2 3386 days ago
No, it's not necessarily. You can have a product that produces a good result but isn't easy to use. That doesn't make it not useful.
link
omeid2 3386 days ago
If we are going to split hair, I would argue that good design is mostly reasoned with theory, usefulness is more about pragmatism.
link
FanaHOVA 3386 days ago
Craigslist wasn't built today. Name any recent product with the same design.
link
mawburn 3386 days ago
There are lots of products that don't have great design. We're on one now. But there are tons and tons of B2B products shipping from full stack developers every day that don't have great design. But they work, and because they work, they make people happy.

Good aesthetics are nice when you have them, but are absolutely not a requirement for a good piece software so long that it does it's job and the UX doesn't suck. Most real world people don't care how it looks as much as a lot of designers think they do.

Not too imply design isn't important for a real product. But if you're hiring full stack developers, then you're probably not making a ton of comps.

link
FanaHOVA 3386 days ago
Was HN built today? :) In both cases, you are talking about websites were there's minimal interaction with the website and all you do is read. While that's ok for certain kinds of products, it's not for all of them. So I think we agree that design doesn't make the software, but most devs are used to having weird interfaces and interactions that aren't always clear to normal users. (I'm saying this as a full stack dev myself while looking at the colleagues that I've worked with in the past/present)
link
mawburn 3386 days ago
It sounds like you're talking about UX. There is quite a bit of intersect, but you can have fantastic UX and still be aesthetically gross. You can't have a weird interface that doesn't make sense and still claim to have a good user experience.

And on the other side, an app can be aesthetically beautiful and total have crap UX, which is too common with a lot of startuppy products.

link
coolgeek 3386 days ago
Being built "today" doesn't have anything to do with it.

Although they have better UI/aesthetics, from a UX perspective, Google and Amazon famously hew pretty closely to their original product design.

What matters to these companies - and, more importantly, their customers - is delivering the content that the customer wants, at the fastest possible speed.

link
SpaceL10n 3386 days ago
Still nicer than Craigslist, but its close: https://www.gov.uk/
link