|
|
|
|
|
by djaychela
3389 days ago
|
|
I'm constantly amazed at the waste that happens when people decide they are going to destroy an old (serviceable) hard drive because they want to protect their old data on it. I don't see a need in 99% of cases, when there are perfectly good ways to permanently delete the data and make it unrecoverable, albeit taking a longer time. No doubt I'll get shot to bits for this with various edge cases where it's important that the data is not recoverable, but the environmental cost of people destroying perfectly good drives because they want to upgrade and think that drilling or thermite is the way forward needs to be taken into account. Yes, it's quick to do the drilling, but is it really necessary when a free piece of software will render the same drive usable but without any real chance of access to the data that's on there? We live in an increasingly throwaway society, but I'm certain that we will be viewed with true disgust by future generations when they see how knowingly profligate we have been with the resources we had access to. |
|
Unless you're dealing with top-secret material, losing the encryption key is the best way
Or just dd around 5x - 50x (or more if you're paranoid) its size to the disk - if you want to further reuse it. No, you won't have a meaningful amount of data remaining on the disk and extracting it requires special software/hardware. Unless you're dealing with data that makes the disk price irrelevant, you can follow this procedure.
But if you're in the mood for vulgar displays of power, microwave the board or use a Tesla coil