|
|
|
|
|
by kuschku
3381 days ago
|
|
Sadly, pulse is also still quite fragile and has a massive latency. It’d be preferable if for Linux there was an audio server closer to what JACK is (although both JACK and JACK2 aren’t ideal either). (That said, I mix hardware mixing and pulse for my purposes) |
|
The trade-off for latency in PA is lower power usage. I think most consume users are pretty happy that their sound system does not suck tons of energy just to offer sub-10ms of audio latency.
> JACK
AFAIK, PulseAudio and Jack 2 can work pretty seamlessly together thanks to a new dbus API (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PulseAudio/Examples#Pul...).