|
|
|
|
|
by joshuamorton
3396 days ago
|
|
No, that was valid, concise, actionable feedback. Your original post was flippant and was not actionable. Although since gpkit almost assuredly uses the cPython c abi, and there is no emscripten backend for cPython, even this (much less flippant and much more actionable and valid) feedback isn't actually actionable because you cannot execute python+some c module using emscripten. |
|
"flippant" means "not showing a serious or respectful attitude". I do not know at which point noting that a system is not scaling as feedback in a request for feedback post suddenly is disrespectful.
But now read at your own post, with the ad hominem. Seems disrespectful, maybe even "flippant". What is the point of acting in the exact same way you so fiercely criticize?
Then, how sure are you about that exactly? you can run a functional Linux kernel through emscripten, there must be a way to get a Python extension to work.