|
|
|
|
|
by badminton1
3392 days ago
|
|
I took the time to try the thing, and it did not work for me due to timeouts. Others reported the same. Therefore it was showing signs of not scaling. And I pointed it out through a concise comment in a post which was about requesting for feedback (the objective of the Ask HN section). Could not provide more feedback since I could not use it. "flippant" means "not showing a serious or respectful attitude". I do not know at which point noting that a system is not scaling as feedback in a request for feedback post suddenly is disrespectful. But now read at your own post, with the ad hominem. Seems disrespectful, maybe even "flippant". What is the point of acting in the exact same way you so fiercely criticize? Then, how sure are you about that exactly? you can run a functional Linux kernel through emscripten, there must be a way to get a Python extension to work. |
|
Perhaps, although it seems as though it was less "not scaling" and more "someone exploited our system to spin the CPU" from my reading of the thread.
>"flippant" means "not showing a serious or respectful attitude"
And I hold to the claim that a 2 word response to an ask HN is absolutely flippant. Please explain to me what is actionable about "Doesn't scale"? That is a problem. Or, well, it could be a problem, it might not be a worry for them, but lets assume it is. "Doesn't scale" isn't actionable. Had your second post been the only post you made here, I don't think we'd be having this discussion, because while in this case it turns out to be not very helpful, it is at least actionable. They can look into emscripten and python, see that it probably won't work in this case, and move on. "Doesn't scale" doesn't do that.
Its the difference between feedback that is "you have a lisp" and "you have a lisp, try practicing speaking lyrically or rhythmically and it might disappear." It might help, it might not, but its actionable. "you have a lisp" isn't actionable.
I'll quote the Show HN Guidelines:
>Instead of "you're doing it wrong", suggest alternatives. When someone is learning, help them learn more.
As for what you think of my comment, I have a few objections to your statement:
1. I don't actually see an 'ad hominem' anywhere, I only commented on your original comment and how your feedback was unhelpful. No commentary on the user, only the content. Please specify where I did, because I would prefer to not go around attacking people on HN, even unintentionally. 2. I went so far as to complement your second post and say that it was an example of good feedback. 3. You didn't post a Show HN, there are no guidelines on my feedback to you ;)
That said, if your emscripten suggestion was made in good faith and not just a CYA "suggestion", I apologize, I misread your tone.