|
|
|
|
|
by yesbabyyes
3432 days ago
|
|
I feel hopeful about the outcome of the election. I'm interested to see what can happen with an effective reset of corporate sponsorship in the highest seat of government. The nice side effect of businesses not believing that he could become president, is that they didn't have as much time to buy favours. Secretary of State: Exxon's chairman and CEO Secretary of the Treasury: Goldman Sachs' CIO Secretary of Commerce: The "King of Bankruptcy" Secretary of Labor: CEO of Hardee's Secretary of Education: From the Amway/Blackwater family I could go on, but pray tell: What would be the point of buying favours when you are in the position of doling them out? |
|
I would say that your question is a loaded one, one that assumes the worst of each of the people you listed. That they are all corrupt and would put their own businesses above all else.
A question that I don't see asked often (and when it is the answer isn't very apparent) is who else would be better suited?
Considering the Obama administration was heavily weighted toward academia and political establishment figures, something which Trump campaigned hard against, who else would you pick other than the biggest business leaders?