|
|
|
|
|
by microcolonel
3434 days ago
|
|
There is a huge difference between the face of Exxon being secretary of state, and the secretary of state secretly representing Exxon. It is a lot easier to tell when the CEO of Exxon is being transparently preferential to Exxon, than it is to say for sure that the secretary of state is being opaquely preferential. And even if he can manage to slip Exxon-preferential policy through without rejection, I would argue that the United States of Exxon is far better for Americans than the United States of Saudi Oil Money. That's what you got with the last Secretary of State. |
|
You've been had.