[nishs]

And even more relevant today. Especially after yesterday's fiasco where Chrome doesn't allow installing self-made extensions permanently—forcing you to publish on the Chrome Web Store [0].

There were a few years (2010-2014) when Chrome was a clear industry leader: in design, web standards, resource consumption, and championing openness on the Internet. Not anymore, at least for me:

  * Firefox has built-in Reader mode and RSS, while Chrome still doesn't.
  * Firefox's ES-next compatibility is comparable to Chrome, and Safari Technology Preview is ahead [1].
  * Chrome hasn't embraced the WebExtensions specification (I'd love to be wrong on this).
  * Killing Chrome Apps [2].
  * Chrome displays an ambiguous/dissuasive popup when you attempt to enable Do Not Track [3].

I hope once Servo is production-ready, it performs far better than Chrome that the browser performance enthusiasts are also willing to switch.

That said, Chrome's Web Inspector is top-notch, and it is the only thing I miss from switching to Firefox.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13325507

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13133135

[2] http://venturebeat.com/2016/08/19/google-will-kill-chrome-ap...

[3] http://imgur.com/a/fHAyx

[Tharre]

> * Chrome hasn't embraced the WebExtensions specification (I'd love to be wrong on this).

I'm by no means an expert on this, but aren't WebExtensions based on the chrome extension API? Says pretty much that on the developers page[0] of Mozilla as well.

[0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/WebExtensions

[nishs]

Yes. But according to wiki.mozilla.org on WebExtensions [0]:

We strive for compatibility to make developers lives easier and are participating in a W3C community group to work on a standard.

Although Chrome is by no means obligated to, it would be nice to see a company such as Google—that claims to support openness on the Internet—adopt this more open standard. (That is, "browser.storage.local" instead of "chrome.storage.local").

[0] https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebExtensions/FAQ#Are_they_compatib...

[disordinary]

I use Firefox on both mobile and desktop, they've made massive strides recently and it now feels lighter and faster than Chrome, however there is some sort of memory leak in either Firefox and one of my (limited) extensions and it slows down slowly until it no longer is responsive and I need to restart it.

I too can't wait for Servo, although the reality is that it's still an experiment and is miles away from being anywhere near feature complete or compatible with the years worth of edge cases coded into Gecko, I wouldn't hold my breath on Firefox being based on Servo in the medium term, however Servo will find a use in quite a few niches where the content is much more controlled, courtesy of it's compatibility with the CEF.

[tehabe]

"Killing Chrome Apps" is actually a good thing, at least for the an open web. It means, that apps on the web are supposed to be on the web and not packaged in the browser. Google has said that this was a temporary measure.

Essentially, for those apps or websites it shouldn't matter if they run in Chrome, Safari, Edge, or Firefox.