[FireBeyond]

"the old 0-60 time"

The _current_ 0-60 time, you mean. Especially with this:

"And Tesla only compares with cars currently in production."

considering this is only a teaser tweet, there's a slight hint of irony there. "Currently in production" is also very different from "fastest production cars". Very selective.

This happened last time Tesla announced something like this - people fell over themselves to install it in the Wikipedia page for fastest production cars. Even though it was: 1) not yet available, 2) not verified, and 3) described even by Tesla themselves as an "expected result". i.e. a press release.

When that didn't work, they took to the page to add a new column to the list of accepted results, to add, effectively "manufacturer projected results", with the end result looking entirely silly and forced - a top 20 chart with Tesla being the only one to have a result in a "not real, not yet" column.

[mikeash]

One of the meanings of "old" is "former or previous."

And I see no irony. The teaser tweet is stated using the future tense. It will be the fastest car in production once it comes, unless some other car maker has a big surprise between now and then.

As for the Wikipedia stuff, I offer no defense of it, but I'm not surprised. Wikipedia suffers from plenty of fanboyism.

[FireBeyond]

"We don't compare against cars not currently in production. Our car, not currently in production, is faster."

But it's not the biggest thing in the world. :)

[mikeash]

Replace "is" with "will be" and the strangeness goes away.

There's also the weird aspect that the car itself has been sold for months, they'll just become faster once the update hits.