My mistake, I thought you were saying I could still have the syntax features I wanted in the language. I like the range syntax, and backticks, and calling functions'. I also liked signals and having access to more stuff that is now 'magic' in the Elm compiler.
No, those don't really appeal to me. I think Elm had a great middle ground for a while pre-0.16 with Signals. I'm just disappointed at what I see as a lack of positive change for the language. The more stuff that becomes compiler magic the worse the language is going to get IMO.
Html.App used to be a namespace, I suspect you mean Program? In any case, how is that any more, or less, magic than Signals? Considering that the compiler has removed syntax in later versions, later versions of Elm has less magic than earlier versions.
So instead of:
I will have to write: https://github.com/Fresheyeball/elm-return/pull/4/files#diff...And it affects package API too: https://github.com/elm-lang/svg/commit/40b761d66b48fcc28f5b5...
However that's just a matter of taste and does not deter me from continuing to use Elm.