Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by revo13 3603 days ago
Yeah, I know the foundation for it. It is just an irritating process (I know, stating the obvious) that should be better. Both the company and applicant invested time/money in exploring a relationship, and candidates shouldn't be left with a brutally ambiguous result. Even if it takes 5 more min in a debrief and some possible hurt feelings, the company should respect candidates enough to spend that time and help them understand the specific reason(s) as to why they aren't getting the job. I really want to know, was it my salary reqs, my quietness, my loudness, I looked wrong at the VP of Eng/CEO?

This applies to onsite interviews obviously, not initial phone screens.

2 comments

The company defaults to polite silence to avoid legal liability. They can't risk saying anything which might be construed as discrimination against a protected class.
I kind of wonder if "not a culture fit" could be construed that way if you were an underrepresented minority. It's pretty close to existing coded language.
from the other comments you know reasons why they most likely won't debrief you. Occasionally you'll get honest and good feedback, related to a certain skillset missing. I mean if you wanted to try ahead of time, if they ask for an interview, maybe only agree with it if they transparent about XYZ for you. Just keep in mind that not getting a job is always a little ego damage and your ego will likely be seeking some comfort. The best comfort after those losses would be hitting the gym and moving on. Let your endorphins and physical training and progression lead the way. In case you were wondering, alcohol doesn't help and hurts worse in this process.