[kljhgfvgbn]

There are a couple of larger models where the crew rest area is in the cargo hold. It's a removable unit the full width of the plane - equal to two of those 5sided luggage pods and is very comfortable.

Airlines looked at using them as sleeping berths for first class passengers but it's difficult to meet the escape time requirements.

Although you chances of exiting the aircraft in 90secs if it crashed in the middle of the Atlantic in the middle of the night are pretty small - the FAA has to pretend it's possible.

[jrockway]

Although you chances of exiting the aircraft in 90secs if it crashed in the middle of the Atlantic in the middle of the night are pretty small - the FAA has to pretend it's possible.

What? This requirement is actually quite important. Take a look at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_France_Flight_358

I followed a few links and skimmed the full report, but couldn't find the time it took to evacuate. But it was under 90 seconds, even with several exits not usable. Since the aircraft was already burning before it came to a stop, any time savings was critical to ensuring survival. And everyone did survive.

So I think this regulation is important. If there was just one exit, and it was blocked, there would have been 300 people dead in a fire instead of 0.

[kljhgfvgbn]

Yes evacuation on take off and landing is very important.

However the regs don't differentiate about the stage of the flight, even if you were only allowed to use the bed during cruise, at 30,000 over the ocean - the same time applies.

[jrockway]

Dunno, this has also been useful. Imagine a scenario like UAL811:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_811

You are downstairs in your bed, when the cabin depressurizes and you can't move around. The depressurization also damages the flight controls, making a clean landing unlikely. The unclean landing occurs, the plane catches on fire, and you burn to death in your bed because "regulations are silly".