Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
qopp
3611 days ago
Just to keep it in memory? Postgres does this already-- it will put tables or parts of tables in memory to speed up reads [1].
[1] Source:
https://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/hw_performance/
1 comments
cobbzilla
3610 days ago
It's not about "just" keeping it in memory, it's about handling hundreds of updates per second without creating un-vacuumable bloat (per description in OP's link).
link