[SilasX]

>This is exactly how a computer algorithm would conflate drawer with drawers.

Because human poets never do wordplay like that?

[gridspy]

Because when humans do, there is an obvious (sometimes less obvious, but present) reason to do so.

There is no such link made in this example between the usages.

[SilasX]

You haven't read a lot of schoolkid poetry posted at public libraries, have you?

[qu4z-2]

That's what I found. All the "human" ones were easy, but then you had to play "machine or awful poet?" on the rest.

[vacri]

I answered 'human' for drawer/drawers, because "surely an algorithm would be designed to avoid this kind of thing? surely it'd be better than that... must just be a bad poet"

[hoke_t]

Are you implying that awful poets are in fact not human?

[qu4z-2]

I believe I could make a solid argument for that. :P

But no, it's just that all the bad poets in the original article were machines in the end.

[arcticfox]

I'm not sure that the majority of that really qualifies as poetry, at least not in a man vs. machine context.