|
|
|
|
|
|
by LionessLover
3649 days ago
|
|
|
> What I'm talking about is extremely elementary Whenever someone doesn't have an argument they resort to such empty phrases, merely repeating over and over "I am right!". Maybe you should have studied some neuroscience LIKE I DID, than you would not be left without arguments in discussions about neuroscience. > plus the actions of muscles all take time! And yet there is no "prediction". As has been pointed out to you by a lot of people including myself repeatedly. Cognitive dissonance is strong in "jamesrcole". |
|
|
except it is not an empty phrase.
It's making a real point: what I'm talking about is a very basic constraint, one that is independent of all the specific technicalities that everyone else brings up. And it is that constraint that means that functionally the brain processing must be doing something anticipatory.
And I notice that your comment here is not making trying to argue any justifications for your points or pointing out any evidence.
You're just asserting and saying that because you studied neuroscience you must be right.