[jamesrcole]

> Whenever someone doesn't have an argument they resort to such empty phrases

except it is not an empty phrase.

It's making a real point: what I'm talking about is a very basic constraint, one that is independent of all the specific technicalities that everyone else brings up. And it is that constraint that means that functionally the brain processing must be doing something anticipatory.

And I notice that your comment here is not making trying to argue any justifications for your points or pointing out any evidence.

You're just asserting and saying that because you studied neuroscience you must be right.