[zepto]

How do you know it's an attack and not just a statement of fact?

[busterarm]

I don't think whether it's an attack or not has much to do with the factual basis of a private disagreement that they had 4 years ago and how that speaks to patio11's character or the quality of his advice now.

Not that I'm sticking up for Patrick. I frequently find myself in (often silent) disagreement with him, but the post was extremely flimsy to me and not much more than an offsite meta-discussion that contributes neither to the original discussion nor this community. I flagged the link but since it remains I think this is worth discussing.

[zepto]

If it's not an attack then everything you've said on this thread is invalidated.

You may not be sticking up for Patrick, but you are sticking up for something. In the absence of an attack, it's unclear what.

[busterarm]

It's absolutely an attack.

[zepto]

What makes it an attack? If what it says is true, it sounds like Patrick also engaged in an attack. Why isn't he so vehemently sanctioned?

[busterarm]

I read the linked post. Patrick wasn't even addressing Mz or a comment of Mz. On the face of it, it looks like Mz read too much into it.

[zepto]

I didn't see such a post - what are you referencing?

[dragonwriter]

Its an attack whether or not its a statement of fact.

[zepto]

What makes it an attack?