|
|
|
|
|
by kolinko
3761 days ago
|
|
As a person who knew only the basic rules beforehand, I wouldn't imagine it any better. Any more complicated and I'd get lost. I'd love to see one day a live commentary, with an extra window showing what computer is thinking at the moment. |
|
1. The computer can discard all its current best ideas and flip through new ones so fast, it would be a flickering blur to humans.
2. Even if we put a speed limit on it, the move being considered is itself the result of considering a lot of slight variations.
3. The ability to _articulate_ in a human language what makes the move nice is itself a "hard problem" closely related to natural language processing.
4. Even just having some color codes or symbols and grouping related ideas has some serious problems: now the visualization is pretty technical to begin with, the computer is still able to memorize and compare moves at an unbelievable rate, and it's still fundamentally not the same as the method Go masters use to find a solution.