|
|
|
|
|
by commonsense
5972 days ago
|
|
There are multiple business models. Witness: 1. They take % of base first year salary on W2 - their incentives are aligned with yours. A good deal. 2. They take % of base hourly rate - their incentives are also aligned with yours. A good deal. However: 3. They receive a flat hourly cap - their incentives are opposite yours. They're trying to fuck you. 4. Flat retainer - their incentives are technically neutral, but the lower they get you onboard, the better they look because their client is spending less. They're trying to fuck you. |
|
Ask yourself this question? Who is actually the recruiter's customer? As in, who pays the bills?
That's right, it's the employer. You're not their customer. The employer is. A recruiter's goal is to fill the open positions out there with their candidates. There's a lot of competition for most positions, both from other recruiters and employees who apply independently. So they'd much rather short you as an employee on salary then risk having someone else hired for the position entirely.
As a hiring manager, I was on the other end of this practice. I can't tell you the number of times a recruiter emailed me something like "He says he wants 90, but he'll actually take 80".
If you know the companies you want to work for, don't use a recruiter.