[zaroth]

Their key differentiation? "Earnest says its approach is particularly data-intensive, which it says allows it to tailor rates to individual circumstances. It asks its customers for digital links to their bank, credit card and retirement and investment accounts, and information on all their loans. “They are willing to share their data for a better consumer finance experience,” Mr. Beryl said."

Apparently they found recent grads with very large student debt load but commensurately high future earning potential had inaccurately low credit scores. Bypassing the credit agencies and doing their own scoring let them offer more competitive rates to that segment in particular, whose big loans probably carry a lucrative underwriting fee, not to mention bigger savings for every basis point you can shave off.

Interestingly they are underwriting as well as servicing ("Earnest will never pass you off to a Third-Party Servicer") which I see as a huge selling point. I wonder how hard it was to get the Federal approval for that?

[JonFish85]

"It asks its customers for digital links to their bank, credit card and retirement and investment accounts, and information on all their loans."

Yikes, that's a bit scary. The dark side of me wonders if there is anything untoward that happens here, in that they can pull money from any of these accounts? That's a LOT of information to be handing over, more than when I applied for my mortgage (especially compounded by the fact that this sounds like an on-going monitoring of these accounts), and I'm not sure I'd feel comfortable with it.

They would know everywhere I've shopped, every single bill I have, every cash withdrawal. I don't know that I want any entity knowing the totality of my finances like that, regardless of whether I'd want a couple of percentage points off of interest (especially considering the historic lows of interest rates right now).

[7Figures2Commas]

> Apparently they found recent grads with very large student debt load but commensurately high future earning potential had inaccurately low credit scores.

Credit scores measure the risk of future default based on past borrowing behavior. A borrower's credit score is not "inaccurately low" if there is little to no past borrowing behavior to apply the credit scoring model to.

Lenders can and frequently do take into account criteria other than credit score, such as income, when underwriting loans. In some lending markets (mostly commercial), individual consumer credit scores aren't even used.

That Earnest and other upstart lenders are choosing to more heavily weigh factors other than credit score is not particularly interesting. The true test of their underwriting criteria will come in the next down cycle. Having worked in this space, I should point out that there are many consumers with high incomes (or high earning potential) who are vulnerable. As such, I'd suggest that income and earning potential alone are of limited use in underwriting. It's not uncommon to see borrowers with high incomes who also have very low credit scores because they were over-leveraged and had serious negative credit events occur.

[zaroth]

I assume as they are getting outside funding, someone has vetted their underwriting models and loan population. I was curious to learn more about their sources of funds, number of current employees, i.e. fund performance, unfortunately nothing written here.

They are mining more information and winning a lower rate for it. To that end they are succeeding. Without understanding the source of funds, and any guarantees they are making, it's important that they provide long-term durable ROI to justify the lower rates.

If they get the lower default rate they are paying for, then Earnest has created a superior product. Their default rate doesn't and shouldn't have to be zero, but I would be afraid of trying to make up on bad underwriting with poor servicing tactics. I hope both centers are striving to be excellent at their respective jobs.

Since default rates on these loans is high and rising, there is a strong incentive to lower it. If default rates were consistently low, paying more for a marginal additional reduction wouldn't be worthwhile. When default rates are trending higher, I believe you need exponentially higher interest rates in order to break even.

[x0x0]

Why would they need federal approval for that? They aren't, afaik, federal student loans.

And there are lots of reasons not to refi federal loans to private loans to save a bit of interest, particularly IBR and pay-earn plans. Though private loans would be dischargeable in bankruptcy, so they have that going for them.

[zaroth]

You're right, Fed loans are paid off, not transferred for serving, perhaps... I originally assumed they would want to centralize servicing of Fed loans as well, and keep the underlying Fed loan alive underneath since it's a cheap source of funds. But they don't do that, probably not technically possible.

Did I read that right, refinanced / private student loans are dischargable in bankruptcy?

[x0x0]

some of them are; details matter

The previous post should have been

s/would/could/

[santaclause33]

None of that seems like a big difference compared to what the leader in that space, SoFi, is doing.

[zaroth]

"We help early stage professionals accelerate their success with student loan refinancing, mortgages, mortgage refinancing, and personal loans." - SoFi. Seems like they are both targeting the same niche.

Does SoFi also service the loan? It's not clear from their landing page. Side-by-side I think Earnest has done a much better job on their site as far as promoting their technology and differentiation.

[virtuallynathan]

SoFi do not service their own loans.