|
|
|
|
|
by RockyMcNuts
3874 days ago
|
|
No reason to obfuscate AFAIK. A bank can just as easily buy a building and rent it out at a profit instead of putting a money-losing branch there. I don't think banks are generally prohibited from investing in real estate, subject to other risk-based capital and liquidity requirements. If there's some loophole that results in an owned branch being treated differently from investment real estate, I'm not aware of it. In NYC anyway, banks typically rent branches. They don't want to be in the real estate and property management business, although they often end up in it involuntarily after foreclosures. |
|