[nchelluri]

Totally agree. Though the "[t]hen you failed at being specific" may be a tad harsh for my taste :)

Can iterate on the test spec/script, like anything else... and at the beginning the doc may even prove to be a great tool for contrasting baseline context between different people/roles/backgrounds.

[stingraycharles]

Yeah I know, it was more the kind of point you need to take with this. It is similar in spirit to "the customer is always right" -- of course that's too harsh, but it gets the point across. :)

[nchelluri]

Truth be told, I totally agree with your sentiment - if the test spec is unclear to the guy executing it, something needs to be changed... just reflective of the direction I've been trying to take my attitudes and my language; I even have a git alias "an", short for annotate, which performs the "blame" command :D ("git-blame - Show what revision and author last modified each line of a file")