|
|
|
|
|
by hughguiney
3968 days ago
|
|
As someone who has been stressing over “needing a cofounder” lately, this is an encouraging and timely post. However, I dislike the phrasing here: > a 100% owner requires half the earning power of 50/50 partners–that gives him a huge advantage. …which assumes the founder is going to be a man. |
|
In my mind, the sexes are equal so him == her. It's something I feel strongly about too especially having a daughter. But nonetheless I understand the implications of what I wrote.
edit: Oh, and I upvoted you :-)