|
|
|
|
|
by jessaustin
3976 days ago
|
|
I don't understand how the word "thesis" can be both "generic", as Automattic repeatedly claim, and "merely descriptive", as they claim in their trademark attack. There is probably some intersection between these two concepts, but it's very small. Perhaps "Salty" as a potential trademark for potato chips would be an example? |
|
If Apple can trademark the name of one of the world's most common fruits, I'm sure Pearson has a right to trademark "thesis".