|
|
|
|
|
by uint32
3982 days ago
|
|
Better than either approach is to take both the objections and the computer-assisted explanations seriously. Then we might ask the following: What qualities do traditional explanations have that aren’t currently shared by computer-assisted explanations? And how can we improve computer-assisted explanations so that they have those qualities? I am interested in this line of reasoning. Can anyone point me to relevant discussion (preferably scholarly)? |
|