[SFjulie1]

I thought puppet/chef were the pit of the devops ridicule. Then I not only saw this, but also positive reactions to a readable code in which you have :

    echo 'nameserver 8.8.8.8' > "$btrfs_path/$uuid"/etc/resolv.conf

This is wrong on so many level that I don't know where to begin with.

[druiid]

Sadly that is pretty much emulating how docker does it. To the best of my knowledge the '8.8.8.8' and '8.8.4.4' name-servers are kind of hard-coded in a lot of containers (all?)

[Gigablah]

Can you share why you think puppet/chef are the "pit of the devops ridicule"?

[dsmithatx]

Having implemented it across 10k+ servers in 12 datacenters I'd say he means Puppet is overly complex for what provides. Kind of like Docker. I think people equate Chef to the same over-complexity.

Having now used Salt and starting to play with Ansible I'm growing an extreme dislike for Puppet and the weeks of my life I can never recover dealing with things that Salt has made so much easier.

[zobzu]

i dont think this part is needed at all, it just means the base image sux basically, so this is some patching up, which, well, is fine for demo purposes