|
|
|
|
|
by solve
3980 days ago
|
|
I've got to wonder to what degree this approach is really hiding the "real" language in a higher-level encoding. E.g. you can write english in morse code, but the combination of those dots and dashes is where the "real" language is, instead of the dots and dashes themselves... |
|
Exactly. In the middle of the article they discuss coming up with an expression to mean "car". Of the many word combinations one might choose (they go with "tomo tawa"), one of them would have to emerge as the standard way to say "car", otherwise effective communication would not really be possible. But at that point you've just created a new word. "Tomo tawa" no longer means anything that combination of words might possibly mean - it means car.
I'd suggest there's a certain irreducible vocabulary, and its size is going to be the same no matter how many base words are used to compose it.