[spydum]

i think the sad pattern I see in a lot of these code golf implementations is the solution score is based on Lines of Code, which we already agree is a POOR representation of either complexity or simplicity.

I think it would be far more interesting to measure number of instructions to complete the objective. Though I suspect the folks familiar with assembly would run circles, perhaps you could segment by solution language?

[NegativeK]

Given the entirely whimsical and (hopefully) intentionally rebellious nature of Code Golf, I don't think that worrying about the usefulness of the metric is really worth it.

[modeless]

You may be interested in http://www.zachtronics.com/tis-100/. It's essentially a code golf game with many different metrics to optimize including number of instructions.

[spydum]

wow, thanks! great line: "It’s the assembly language programming game you never asked for!"

[nsajko]

It's DRM-ed, sadly.

[acc00]

Not anymore: http://www.gog.com/game/tis100

[userbinator]

The demoscene may be of interest if you're into optimising the binary for size and not the source:

http://www.hugi.scene.org/compo/

That one seems abandoned for a few years now but you can find plenty of tiny graphical effects here, executables are 512 bytes and below:

http://www.pouet.net/prodlist.php?type%5B%5D=32b&type%5B%5D=...

[pjungwir]

The reason lines of code is a poor way to score solutions is that you should be counting characters! :-)

My favorite Perl golf challenge is something I got from Boston Perl Mongers many years ago:

You have the numbers 1 to 9 (in order), and in between each number you can insert a plus, a multiply, or nothing. Your program should print all expressions that evaluate to 2002. For instance it should print the solution

    1*23+45*6*7+89

(and one other)

I have a command-line solution in 80 characters, including the `perl ` at the beginning. It works on 5.10 and 5.16. I think there was a better solution back in the 5.8 days, but my notes are unclear.

[ectoplasm]

Once you know the other solution you can do much better than 80 characters!

[JoshTriplett]

Lines of code is a poor representation, but non-whitespace characters is a somewhat better one. Perl golf and vim golf both use that.

[jsmthrowaway]

You are not describing code golf, though. "A sad pattern in chess is checkmate; the goal should be to eliminate the other player entirely."

I agree what you describe would be fun, too, but it isn't code golf.