Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sambeau 3984 days ago
I assume, by the same logic, he'll be removing his music from Radio, too?
1 comments

Probably not.

    I was there.
    AM radio kicked streaming's ass.
    Analog Cassettes and 8 tracks also kicked streaming's ass,
    and absolutely rocked compared to streaming.
The most rose-tinted of nostalgia, absolutely mystifying. I remember AM and cassettes too and they sounded pretty bad, though listenably so. Even Spotify's lower quality is streets ahead; their high quality is indistinguishable from CD for almost anyone.
Somebody needs to visit a qualified audiologist.
AM radio is monural. His argument is invalid. Source: we evolved two ears for some sort of evolutionary advantage.
How radio kicked ass streaming?
Analog transmission artifacts make sound quality worse. Digital transmission errors make playback choppy and intermittent, which completely ruins the rhythm and flow of the music.
Isn't that what buffering is for?

Surely the average data plan could handle ~300kbps streaming with enough of an overhead such that buffering would make interruptions extremely unlikely?

I'd take that over having noticeably degraded sound quality almost all the time with radio.

Satellite radio does sound quite a bit worse than any recorded medium you can buy today. The difference isn't due to errors, but overcompression. That's not a problem with 128K or better AAC streams, or 192K MP3 streams for that matter, yet Young apparently isn't objecting to having his songs played on SiriusXM.

So: yeah, it's safe to say it's all about marketing his snake oil.

This is what buffering is for