[pd1]

Or when you need to log in again to unsubscribe

[eCa]

Which is illegal in the US[1] (and I believe EU, as well), and hence deserves to be reported as spam.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4496688

[TylerE]

A big problem I've had is that many of these are "business relationship/transactional" e-mails, which play by different rules.

My address is my first name + last initial (neither of which are all that uncommon), and this is made much worse by Gmails idiotic ignoring of periods in addresses. There is a dude in Denver, CO who is absolutely convinced his e-mail address is [e-mail]. It isn't. I'm really sick of getting his AT&T and car insurance e-mails.

[tizzdogg]

This happens to me all the time as well. I also have [e-mail] and apparently a lot of other people seem to think they do as well. Or at least, they have [e-mail] and people easily forget to add the number.

I wish there was a better way to deal with this type of situation other than constantly sending "please fix your address book" emails. Email is a broken system.

[e12e]

I'm not sure how you go from: Unless you have Google Apps for Business (or whatever), there are no vanity domains for gmail; to: email is a broken system?

Gmail.com is certainly broken in the sense that they want to cram 10 billion users into a single domain. It's ridiculous marketing/brand-motivated UX failure.

Since forever most mail services had a few vanity-domains, so people could get [e-mail]. But no, Google doesn't want to provide email, they want to provide "Google Mail".

Apologies for the rant, but I can't stand it when big companies create problems through stupidity.

[tizzdogg]

I dont believe I said anything about vanity domains, so I dont know what you mean by that.

I meant that email is broken in the sense that when some stranger mistakenly thinks that your email belongs to them, and continues to give it out or sign it up for mailing lists, you have absolutely no recourse. If you have an email address that like mine is easily mistaken for other ones you get incorrectly-addressed personal emails many times a day. There is no way to find the actual intended recipient or get in contact with that person to say "hey you seem to be confusd, stop using my email address". And there is no really good way to filter those emails, since after all they are coming to your correct address. I think this is the kind of problem that's difficult to appreciate unless it happens to you frequently.

The problem with email is that anyone can email you if they have your address.. thats why we have so much spam. I dont know what the solution is, but it would be much better if the recipient had to opt-in to the conversation somehow as well.

[dingaling]

> so I dont know what you mean by that.

I believe he means that if [e-mail] was already taken, Google should offer [e-mail] rather than [e-mail]. In fact they shouldn't even show that as an option.

Since Google Is now a domain registrar they could create the new domains on the fly.

Then there wouldn't be namespace collisions.

[pd1]

But isn't this true about phone numbers, addresses, and other things that have been around for longer than email?

[brewdad]

I have a rather uncommon first.last combination. Still, there is a woman in a flyover state married to a guy with my same name who seems to think my gmail address is his. I am building up quite the profile of their family. Thanks to Gmail I know where he works, what car she drives, where they went to college and where they fill prescriptions. Fortunately for them, I have no desire to use any of this information.

It is annoying however especially since most of the spam in my spam folder is addressed to her through my email address.

[detaro]

Can't you just set a filter on the wrongly dotted address? Not something you should have to do, but...

[TylerE]

I suppose I could, but I"ve seen MANY variations, and tbh there are enough mis-sends to [e-mail] that it wouldn't really help.

TBH I hardly use personal e-mail these days, it's basically a bucket that receipts and confirmation gets dumped in to, in which case search works well enough. Most actual conversation is done via Facebook or IM, etc.

[Bill_Dimm]

Which is presumably done so that if you forward the newsletter to someone else they can't (accidentally or maliciously) unsubscribe you by clicking the link.

[click170]

When it's trivial to re-subscribe if you want to, I'd prefer that they do include a one-click unsubscribe. I'll deal with anyone who maliciously unsubscribes me from a mailing list that I want to be subscribed to, and this will highlight who my "good" friends are anyway.