|
|
|
|
|
by AnimalMuppet
3993 days ago
|
|
> What is worse is that when someone points it out, there is ALWAYS this one or two variable example being put forward, when the problem exists in the 90% of functions that have 5 or more variables in scope. I would bet a fair amount of money that 90% of Haskell functions do not have 5 or more variables in scope. > Haskell code is yet not written in large companies where there is a readability requirement. Haskell code is not yet written in large amounts in large companies (or anywhere else). Haskell code is, however, written in large companies. Also: Large companies have a readability requirement? I'm not so sure that they do, that it's enforced, or that it's effective. I;m especially not sure that it's effective to the point that an outsider can read it. |
|
Haskell code isn't written in large amounts anywhere? Define large amounts.
For instance the GHC codebase itself is pretty large.