[EddieRingle]

What? The LICENSE file looks like the standard BSD 2-Clause, to me.

EDIT: I read it more closely; it's not a standard BSD, but it's definitely open source, just non-commercial.

[TD-Linux]

Non-commercial does not meet the OSI definition of open source.

[NeutronBoy]

I was getting all geared up to argue with you, I looked up the OSI definition, and ... you're right. I wasn't aware the OSI had a definition, that'll be very useful!