[smacktoward]

> The companies that stay on top (Disney, Nintendo, Blizzard, Valve etc.) are fiercely protective of their brand and never release something they think is just okay.

I'd argue this is not true of Disney, who churn out endless zero-budget, cookie-cutter direct-to-video sequels and spinoffs from their big theatrical hits (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Disney_direct-to-vide...) in order to milk them for every cent they can. Disney does this because they're an easy way to squeeze a few more bucks out of the parents of kids who are obsessed with a particular Disney property, not because they are stories that demand to be told.

[Aqwis]

I think you will find that most of those movies are several years old or more. A while back, new management in Disney changed the company's strategy to focus less on churning out a bunch of direct-to-video sequels to make some easy bucks. Several that were in production at the time and close to release were actually canceled.

[smacktoward]

That's good to hear! Maybe there's hope for them yet.

[troygoode]

There was a period where they were infamous for this, yes, but it was one of the first things Bob Iger & John Lasseter stopped (in ~2007) when they took the top jobs.

http://jimhillmedia.com/editor_in_chief1/b/jim_hill/archive/...