[mikeash]

I think the headline would be much better like, "Wikileaks Global Intelligence File Dump Contains a Great Deal of Malicious Software."

The problem is "loaded" which has two rather different meanings in this context. "X is loaded with Y" can just mean that X contains a lot of Y, but it can also mean that someone loaded a lot of Y into X. If you go for the second meaning, which is an entirely natural reading of the original headline, then the headline is saying "Someone (such as the NSA or their friends) put a lot of malware into this stuff."

As to the "why" question (which for the record was not mine) I don't think it's justifiable to use a misleading headline just because the information is important. Although I imagine the misleading nature of this headline was entirely unintentional.

[balls187]

It depends on how you parse loaded.

I parsed it as "Loaded" as in the way I like my Baked Potatoes "Loaded" with Sour Cream and Bacon.

I can see how you parsed it the other way.

Reading the authors other posts--would it be worth giving him the benefit of the doubt that the author wasn't trying link bait?

[mikeash]

You leave me wondering if you read my comment, since "it depends on how you parse loaded" is most of what I said, and I explicitly gave the author the benefit of the doubt by saying it was probably unintentional.

[balls187]

I stopped reading as soon as I decided to get a baked potato from TGI Fridays.

[mikeash]

You made me hungry, so I see your point.

[dang]

Ok, we took "loaded" out of the title as arguably loaded.